The reason, why our parents should have privilege over their childrens bodies, is tolerance and respect towards the government. I know it sounds absurd. How does it correlate and connect with the government, then you get your ass whooped or kneel on a sack of dry rice! Recently the children of well of rich people, have been conducting in envirnomentalist propaganda by spewing soup on priceless art. I guess they never learned it the hard way. Anyway, the reason we need corporeal punishment, is its our first experience of authority. Its then children learn to negotriate about their rights and how rules are affecting them -- especially in a situation, if you're the first second or third born son/daughter and get wrongfulyu punished for something you didn't do and how it affects your relationships with the family and wrongdoer. Corporeal punbishment allows us to experience the penal code in a safe way, because surely its painfull in the heat of the moment, and you hate your parents to hell and back then you're younger *BUT* then you grow older, you will learn, that you most of the time deserved it, and it got you away from bullshit -- even the times, you got it undeserved, taught you something. Ity taught you restraint and patience -- qualities what the woke lack the most, being like hyperactive deranged lunatics on a sugar rush. That's what you get, then freedom has no responcibility.
That is also the reason, we are bombarded by this fake shit, what is meant to make the father and family altogether week and brittle, so that feminists and grifters would have an easier time to make a killing. I also follow a certain utopian blend of Communism and environmental tendencies, but I draw the line at throwing soup onto priceless art!! How do you hold up something, what needs the utmost attention of all its participants, if you fegrade the majority into a vegetative state? What if one of the supreme leaders gets piss in their heads and infects the entire hive? And this is there corporeal punishment teaches how to take responcibility -- cause and effect.
But no, censorship and controlling all of the public discord will solve it! In the Bible there is a saying, don't rember where exactly, which states: "Don't want to know everything, and dont be overly just, for you have also slandered the king and God behind the corner and why would you die before your time!" When you rely on censorship and control, rather than corporeal punishment in the youth, because the first is clean and popular but the latter causes alot of controvercy, is to drive the dissent underground and making it look cool. Arius would not have so many followers, had not the Catholic Church being such a doushe then converting the german tribes and insisting all worship their king -- the Pope. Much of revolutions happen, beause the leadership is decadent and punishes its critics too harshly while giving candy and nuts to their children and followers. People wil learn fast and loose all respect towards you, and then time of need comes, you have nobody to askew, because you never owned peoples respect, what is gained through things like corporeal punishment. Rules are to be followed and rules have to be strict, not the vague spaced out clusterfuck like the terms of service of Twitter, where you need a lawyer and a PhD to understand it, and still could fall short. It should be unilateral and fair to verybody -- and he who administer it should follow it the same, how he who is lectured. I can't see that in the government nor in the political parties or envirnomental activists. I instead see a lot of unused energy, what failed to be channeled propperly. The other reasoning is false witch hunted tendencies of assuming every word your opponents utter will draw you to the last lair of the Kingdom of Slanesh, to make you fall asleep, so your tormented soul would roam there for eternity, or outright summons your queen to this realm!! It makes the shouting out of phobias ever more irroneus and giving me the urge of holding a mirror in front of those people, who are more clinicly afraid, than the ones mostly accused. It also sounds much like a boy, accuses the girl of being an icequeen and frigid for not having pussy! It is ok to say no, if you don't feel right with an agenda. I think I'll spend some gasoline active services from now on, due to the soup on the artpiece...
You can't have proper dialogue, then you think your opponent is Luciver, though I liked the series with the same name. In order to have dialogue, you need to assume in good faith, that your opponent is an intelligible fair and sound character -- and then you successfully have done so, it reflects back to you through cortesy and respect, that you will see the same in your oponent, who uses you as his mirror, as he is yours. I don't know many people, who like to gaze into judgin eyes -- I studied theology and conversion, wanting to become a pastor. That was the first thing I learned, in how to have a conversation, that you should not judge other people. Although I was told, that most of them shall go to Hell; that I should not read some books, because they are infernal (I still read Thus spoke Zarathustra and found a soulmate for life) that in the end we shall previal and win etc. Basically what you hear in every movement or said by any coach before the big game. But what does it matter, then your facemask makes the horses sweat and the milk ferment (assumed of witches presence) and then have a lecture on how not to be a witch. People will surely follow you then!! Indeed. Halleluyah
If you have corporeal punishment, it is a stronger chance you also have proper dialogue, because it has been whipped into your core, what priority is, and when who does get a say on what terms and how much. Then you wont be seeing one politician speak over another or simply talking the time off. Had I offered such disrespectful lip on my dinnertable towards my grandparens or mother, I would have lectured before and after every bite I took and corporeal punished. Respect starts from respecting yourself, that you hve certain groundrules how to act out, and what is your bottomline, then you see to it, how you lectuire others or if its your business even to do so. Sometimes less said is more good done, than saying something stupid and ruining everything 4 generations tried to build up. But how do you know, what is good or evil, if you never been punished for being edgy or disrespectful in your life and your first encounter with law was then you had to start serving your prison time, or then a commentator ripped your head off and shit in your neck, because you assumed all people think alike, and hence said something only a truebeliever of your sect could comprehend. People can come to the same conclusions and follow your narrative, but they mostly think differently!! That is the strength and weakness of democracy. Then it could also happen, you don't need to involve yourself in such methods, because a debate shall yield better results.
Thus our parents should have privilege over our bodies, maybe even privilege over who we can marry (the old marriage hag should be reinstated -- the old spinster woman, wo goes looking for a proper woman for you, based on received criteria from your parents, on the marketplace, and knows who in the community is slutty or otherwise unworthy of marriage), then there will be no more problems with incels and unhinged activists.
